Set the context
In the pilot workflow, a coordinator manages the candidate invitation and shares the task brief and expectations before work begins.
Skillwick for employers
See how a QA candidate investigates a conversational assistant, tests a hypothesis, and explains what they find.
Pilot product · Public enrollment is not open
Your assessment workflow
Use the work as a starting point for understanding a candidate's approach.
In the pilot workflow, a coordinator manages the candidate invitation and shares the task brief and expectations before work begins.
The candidate works in the prototype, tests the assistant, and records findings. Look for a deliberate approach and well-supported observations.
Use the available session record and submitted evidence to explore their reasoning, priorities, and what they would test next.
The assessment supports your judgment. It does not make an automated hiring decision.
What to look for
These are dimensions to explore in the work, not a claim of validated scoring or automatic qualification.
How does the candidate turn an ambiguous situation into useful tests? Look for intentional variations, boundaries, and a clear expected result.
Can they reproduce an issue and connect the assistant’s behavior to the source of truth? Look for specific observations and a coherent explanation.
How do they describe severity, uncertainty, and customer impact? Use their decisions to open a deeper discussion about quality.
Before you begin
The current platform is a coordinated assessment workflow.
Not yet. Skillwick is a pilot product with operator-managed access. This website explains the workflow; it does not offer account registration or a live employer console.
No. The banking interface is a prototype used as the setting for the assessment. Candidates should follow the task brief and use the supplied assessment data.
The platform supports continuing an invited session. Assessment access is separate from this public website; invited participants should follow their coordinator’s instructions.
No. Grounding, unsupported claims, context, safety, test design, and evaluation judgment describe relevant areas of inquiry. They are not separate packaged assessments or certified proficiency levels.
Explore the practical workflow and the evidence it is designed to support.